What People MissOn the things we let go of without noticing

Founded 2023Bengaluru125 articlesIndependent & reader-funded

Work

The Company Softball Team And Coworkers Who Lived Nearby

Employer-sponsored teams and clubs existed because workforces were geographically concentrated, and they dissolved as commutes lengthened and employment became shorter.

A focused craftsman using a chisel and vise for detailed wood carving. Capturing the essence of traditional woodworking.
Photograph by Pragyan Bezbaruah via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

Large employers once fielded softball teams, bowling squads, choirs and hobby clubs. These were not perks in the modern sense; they were possible because the workforce lived nearby.

Proximity was the enabling condition

A weeknight game requires players who can reach a field after work without a long drive. That is only true when employees live within a few miles of the plant.

Industrial employment was concentrated that way for most of the last century. Housing grew around workplaces because commuting options were limited.

As commutes lengthened, the after-work hour disappeared into driving. The team did not lose interest; the schedule became impossible for enough people to field one.

Tenure made the investment sensible

A team built over several seasons assumes the same people will be present next year. Long tenure made that a reasonable assumption for both the employer and the players.

Shorter job tenure changes the calculation. A roster that turns over substantially each year cannot develop the continuity that made the activity worth organizing.

Employers also had a clearer interest when workers were expensive to replace. Anything that reduced turnover paid for itself, and social ties reduce turnover.

Mixing levels was the underrated effect

A team sorted people by availability and ability rather than by rank. A machinist and a manager could be on the same roster with the batting order deciding precedence.

That produced contact across the organizational chart that no meeting structure creates. Information moved sideways as a result.

It also created relationships that survived disputes. Two people who had played together for years negotiated differently than two who knew each other only through a process.

Facilities were the visible commitment

Some employers maintained fields, halls and recreation buildings outright. These were capital expenditures on employee social life, which is unusual by current standards.

Those assets often outlasted the arrangement. Many towns have a park or a hall that was built by a company and later transferred to public ownership.

The buildings persist while the programs do not, which makes the change visible on the landscape. The field is still there and no one from the plant plays on it.

Distributed work removed the last requirement

Remote and hybrid arrangements mean coworkers may not share a city, let alone a neighborhood. Nothing that depends on physical assembly on a weeknight can be organized.

Substitutes exist, including virtual events and periodic gatherings, and they do a genuinely different thing. Recurrence with the same people in the same place is what produced the ties.

The loss falls hardest on people who used the workplace as their main source of local acquaintance, which for much of the last century was most people.

Questions readers ask

Do pneumatic tube systems still exist?

Yes, particularly in hospitals, where samples, medication and documents need to move quickly and cannot simply be transmitted as data. Some large retail and industrial sites also still use them for cash and paperwork.

Was internal mail really that slow?

Typically a few hours, since collections ran on a schedule rather than continuously. That delay is often remembered as a flaw, but it also limited how widely anything was circulated and gave senders time to reconsider.

Workofficesdocumentslogisticswork
Fern Ashby
Contributing writer, What People Miss

Fern writes about ritual, repetition and the calendar as a social technology.

Also by Fern Ashby

Read next

More work →